Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2003-2 VS Sarah Richard Buck (2007CA0351 Consolidated With 2007CA0352)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2007 CA 0351 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2003 2 VS SARAH RICHARD BUCK CONSOLIDATED WITH 2007 CA 0352 SARAH RICHARD BUCK VS WASHINGTON PARISH SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT AUBREY JONES AND CIVIL DEPUTY JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 21 2007 ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 90 449 C W 92 799 DIVISION F PARISH OF WASHINGTON STATE OF LOUISIANA HONORABLE MARTIN E COADY JUDGE CHARLES H HECK JR MONROE ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF APPELLEE LA DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2003 2 S SARAH RICHARDS BUCK IN PROPER PERSON FOR PLAINTIFF IN FRANKLINTON RECONVENTION APPELLANT LA RICHARD W WATTS ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS APPELLEES FRANKLINTON AUBREY JONES LA SHERIFF OF WASHINGTON PARISH BEFORE GAIDRY MCDONALD AND MCCLENDON n MCDONALD J This is from appeal Judgment of Dismissal arising from matters a judgment dismissing a which judgment concludes convoluted foreclosure After Sarah Richards Buck filed motions 29 May 2007 to dated to August on to 2005 and supplement February March 8 2007 insofar 2005 the letter of November 30 2004 May A writ it related as The motion was Annul to procedural taking this appeal the appellant supplement the appeal record denied the motion Petition a 2007 panel of this and court correspondence to supplement to to the referred 10 addressed panel reviewing the merits The issues the trial court properly before this following determine whether the a voluntary judgment dismissing all actions filed practice Buck there as was no alleged fraud or ill court of amendment to the a state court court of asserts practice is in that the trial error change 1 The and petition was was deprived perjurious originally amended to add as a filed to Z Buck also filed a was Final and 3 s 1 2005 fraud or ill conclusion that Deutsche and its Judgment s substance The judgment would be of a deprived right right to pursue The court Long Beach defendant Deutsche Bank National 2 18 to a trial in her claims in considered an testimony As It Pertains to claim in federal court s Buck to by August by they failed to file any kind 2 of the Deutsche Long Beach Z a Motion for the Dismissal competent jurisdiction was on court because in the alternative or action and she is affidavit which those addressed by Buck should be annulled for unconscionable if executed because Buck the are of dismissal rendered Buck consent s appeal motion for dismissal filed counsel took it upon themselves to without the mover on Mortgage Company Company as trustee for We will not consider the trial court in converting a The trial to Annul acts or Judgment ill court that issued on not were 2006 by defendant Buck should be and valid written was judgment the date of the order After finding as denied which Buck an interim order required by they relate to were no That judgment thorough review of was the directing entire judgment signed July court to Annul orders s or Petition fraudulent Buck 1 art on the record is denied a the trial court to 1918 within 30 July court Judgment filed by writ sign days a of 1 2007 record of this matter properly before this court and we 2007 and issue this summary in accordance with URCA Rule 2 16 2 supplement the trial Thereafter appealed signed affirm the trial alleged by signed by was La C C P errors to permanent injunction that there that the Petition consideration of the motion as a judgment denying Buck An order counsel s finding of this court issued opinion to appealed for its reasons June 23 November 20 2006 panel insofar pendens regarding actions by the practices warranting the annulment of the judgment of dismissal committed on court of error preliminary injunction and cancellation of the lis judgments by the trial assignments 6 8 and All costs of this 10 appeal The are assessed to Sarah Richards Buck MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT AFFIRMED 3 DENIED JUDGMENT
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
