Vernon C. Shields VS O. Kent Andrews, Warden, Allen Correctional Center and Richard L. Stalder, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2006 CA 1073 VERNON C SHIELDS VERSUS O KENT ANDREWS WARDEN ALLEN CORRECTIONAL CENTER RICHARD STALDER SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CORRECTIONS Judgment rendered March 28 2007 Appealed from the 19th Judicial District Court in and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge Louisiana Trial Court No 444 532 Honorable Janice Clark Judge VERNON C SHIELDS IN PROPER PERSON KINDER LA MELINDA L LONG ATTORNEY FOR BATON ROUGE LA DEFEN DANT APPELLEE RICHARD STALDER BEfORE PETTIGREW DOWNING AND HUGHES JJ PETIIGREW J In this case petitioner Safety and Corrections ALN 2004 216 an inmate in the sought review of Administrative Remedy Procedure No DPSC petitioner s appeal of the DPSC Disciplinary Board which had denied decision to sentence him to a change working cellblock for to maximum status review of the record herein Report the trial prejudice This jurisprudence we we twenty four weeks of find 6 no error 7 a incentive pay and rule violation 1 Following s custody a de a novo including the traversal by petitioner and the Commissioner s followed affirm the trial court s Rule 2 16 2A S loss of court maintained the decision appeal custody of the Department of Public After of law judgment and or a by DPSC dismissing petitioner thorough suit with review of the record and relevant abuse of discretion by the trial in accordance with Uniform Rules 8 s All costs associated with this court Therefore Courts of appeal are Appeal assessed against petitioner Vernon C Shields AFFIRMED 1 According to the record petitioner was in possession of a letter the contents of which if circulated safety security and orderly operation of the prison the other inmates could tend to threaten the 2 among
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
