JOHNSON (BRANSON ROY) VS. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: MARCH 18, 2011; 10:00 A.M.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals
NO. 2010-CA-001390-MR
BRANSON ROY JOHNSON
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE JAMES D. ISHMAEL JR., JUDGE
ACTION NO. 98-CR-00984
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
APPELLEE
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE: COMBS, THOMPSON, AND VANMETER, JUDGES.
VANMETER, JUDGE: Branson Roy Johnson appeals pro se from an order of the
Fayette Circuit Court denying his motion requesting satisfaction of his sentence.
We affirm.
In 1999, Johnson was convicted of criminal syndicate, sentenced to fifteenyears’ imprisonment, and ordered to pay restitution to certain banks totaling an
amount of $12,861.60. In 2010, Johnson filed a motion with the trial court
requesting an order that he satisfied his restitution obligation. In support of his
motion, Johnson attached three letters written to Chase Bank, Square D Federal
Credit Union, and UK Federal Credit Union in which he requested payment
ledgers documenting the amount he had paid in restitution, and the balance owed
as of June 2, 2010. Only Chase Bank responded, stating Johnson still owed
$944.91. The trial court denied the motion, finding that the evidence did not
adequately demonstrate that Johnson satisfied his obligation. Additionally, the
trial court advised Johnson to contact his parole officer for an accurate record of
his payment history. This appeal followed.
On appeal, Johnson maintains he satisfied his obligation and provides, as
attachments to his appellate brief, additional documents from the Department of
Corrections that he purports reflect his offender/payee account summaries with
each bank. Johnson alleges the documents inaccurately reflect his payment
schedule. Regardless, since these documents were not offered into evidence before
the trial court, they cannot be considered on appeal. See Lawrence v. Risen, 598
S.W.2d 474, 476 (Ky.App. 1980) (holding that issues not timely raised before the
trial court cannot be considered as a new argument on appeal). We agree with the
trial court that the letters written by Johnson to three separate banks are insufficient
to support his motion. Based on the inconclusiveness of the evidence, the trial
court did not err by denying Johnson’s motion.
The order of the Fayette Circuit Court is affirmed.
-2-
ALL CONCUR.
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
Branson Roy Johnson, Pro se
LaGrange, Kentucky
Jack Conway
Attorney General of Kentucky
Todd D. Ferguson
Assistant Attorney General
Frankfort, Kentucky
-3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.