THOMPSON (JOHN FRANCIS) VS. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: MARCH 18, 2011; 10:00 A.M.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals
NO. 2010-CA-000954-MR
JOHN FRANCIS THOMPSON
v.
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM GRAVES CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE TIMOTHY C. STARK, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 02-CR-00043
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
APPELLEE
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE: COMBS, THOMPSON, AND VANMETER, JUDGES.
VANMETER, JUDGE: John Francis Thompson appeals pro se from an order of
the Graves Circuit Court denying his motion to release his mental health records.
For the following reasons, we affirm.
On May 14, 2003, Thompson appeared in open court with his attorney and
changed his plea of not guilty to a plea of guilty, but mentally ill, to murder and
first-degree burglary. The trial court entered findings and an order ruling on
Thompson’s motion to enter a plea of guilty, but mentally ill, specifically
addressing Thompson’s mental condition and evaluation history with Kentucky
Correctional Psychiatric Center (“KCPC”). The court concluded that the record
supported Thompson’s plea of guilty, but mentally ill, in accordance with the
provisions of KRS1 504.130(1)-(2). Thereafter, the trial court entered judgment on
Thompson’s plea of guilty and sentenced him to life in prison without the
possibility of probation or parole for twenty-five years on the count of murder and
twenty years’ imprisonment on the count of first-degree burglary, to run
concurrently.
Thompson then moved to amend the judgment and sentence pursuant to CR2
60.02 and CR 60.03, which the trial court denied. Thompson also moved to vacate
the sentence pursuant to RCr3 11.42, which was denied. Subsequently, Thompson
filed a motion to release his mental health records for the purpose of further
pursuing post-conviction relief, which the trial court denied. This appeal followed.
On appeal, Thompson argues he is entitled to release of his mental health
records to perfect a post-conviction motion. He maintains that his guilty plea was
involuntary because he was under the influence of mind-altering medication and
1
Kentucky Revised Statutes.
2
Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure.
3
Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure.
-2-
suffered from mental instability during the plea negotiations and plea colloquy.
We disagree.
In Kentucky, the structure for challenging the final judgment of a trial court
in a criminal matter
is not haphazard and overlapping, but is organized and
complete. That structure is set out in the rules related to
direct appeals, in RCr 11.42, and thereafter in CR 60.02.
CR 60.02 is not intended merely as an additional
opportunity to raise Boykin defenses. It is for relief that is
not available by direct appeal and not available under
RCr 11.42. The movant must demonstrate why he is
entitled to this special, extraordinary relief. Before the
movant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing, he must
affirmatively allege facts which, if true, justify vacating
the judgment and further allege special circumstances
that justify CR 60.02 relief.
Gross v. Commonwealth, 648 S.W.2d 853, 856 (Ky. 1983).
Further, “courts have much more to do than occupy themselves with
successive ‘reruns’ of RCr 11.42 motions stating grounds that have or should have
been presented earlier.” Hampton v. Commonwealth, 454 S.W.2d 672, 673 (Ky.
1970) (citation omitted). Here, the record reflects that Thompson already filed two
motions for post-conviction relief, pursuant to CR 60.02 and RCr 11.42, both of
which were denied. The final disposition of his RCr 11.42 motion concluded “all
issues that could reasonably have been presented in the same proceeding.” RCr
11.42(3). Accordingly, we decline to review the trial court’s denial of Thompson’s
motion for release of his mental health records to perfect another post-conviction
motion.
-3-
The order of the Graves Circuit Court is affirmed.
COMBS, JUDGE, CONCURS.
THOMPSON, JUDGE, DISSENTS WITHOUT SEPARATE
OPINION.
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
John Francis Thompson, Pro se
LaGrange, Kentucky
Jack Conway
Attorney General of Kentucky
Courtney J. Hightower
Assistant Attorney General
Frankfort, Kentucky
-4-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.