PRICE (JOHN M.) JR. VS. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: JUNE 3, 2011; 10:00 A.M.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals
NO. 2009-CA-002416-MR
JOHN M. PRICE, JR.
v.
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 09-CI-00453
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
APPELLEE
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE: LAMBERT AND STUMBO, JUDGES; SHAKE,1 SENIOR JUDGE.
STUMBO, JUDGE: John M. Price, Jr. appeals from an Order of the Franklin
Circuit Court dismissing his petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus. Price, who is
incarcerated at the Northpoint Training Center, argues that the Department of
1
Senior Judge Ann O’Malley Shake, sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice
pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and Kentucky Revised Statutes
(KRS) 21.580.
Corrections violated his Due Process and Equal Protection rights by improperly
depriving him of good time credit. He appears to maintain that he is entitled to
good time credit earned while on parole for 1,995 days. We find no error in the
dismissal of his petition, and accordingly affirm.
On March 19, 2009, Price, who was incarcerated on a parole
violation, filed a pro se petition in Franklin Circuit Court seeking a Writ of
Mandamus. In support of the petition, Price claimed that the Department of
Corrections failed to adhere to the mandatory sentencing language of KRS
431.215, KRS 532.100(7) and HB 406. As best we can tell from examining the
petition and the record, it appears that Price maintained that he was entitled to a
credit of 1,995 days toward his sentence for time spent on parole. The Franklin
Circuit Court action was preceded by Price exhausting his administrative remedies.
During the pendency of the circuit court action, Price was transferred
to the Northpoint Training Center. On September 8, 2009, the Department of
Corrections filed a motion to dismiss the petition. In support of the motion, the
Department claimed that Price had been awarded 1,995 days of sentencing credit
on February 4, 2009, of which Price apparently was not aware when he filed the
petition. In support of this claim, the Department tendered Price’s Resident
Record Card, which the Department claimed demonstrated that Price received the
1,995 days of sentencing credit at issue, and as provided for by HB 406.
On September 8, 2009, the Franklin Circuit Court rendered an Order
dismissing Price’s petition as moot. This appeal followed.
2
Price now argues that the Franklin Circuit Court erred in dismissing as
moot his petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus. He maintains that the circuit court
erred in failing to conclude that the Department of Corrections violated his Due
Process and Equal Protection rights by denying him an award of good time credit
(as opposed to credit toward his sentence) as required by statute. He also argues
that the court erred in dismissing his petition “without a basis of facts being
established.”
Having closely examined the record and the law, we find no error.
The petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus sought sentencing credit for time when
Price was on parole. That credit was based on HB 406, more commonly known as
the “budget bill” for the biennium beginning on July 1, 2008.2 It states that,
Notwithstanding KRS 439.344, the period of time spent
on parole shall count as a part of the prisoner’s remaining
unexpired sentence when it is used to determine a
parolee’s eligibility for a final discharge from parole as
set out in subsection (5) of this section or when a parolee
is returned as a parole violator for a violation other than a
new felony conviction.
In support of its motion to dismiss, the Department of Corrections tendered proof
in the form of Price’s Resident Record Card that he had received 1,995 days
counted toward his remaining sentence. Persuaded by this proof, and because
Price had been transferred from the Fayette County Detention Center during the
2
In 2008, the Kentucky General Assembly enacted HB 406 - the Commonwealth’s biennial
budget - and Governor Beshear signed it into law. Part I, Section I (5)(c)(4)-(5) of HB 406 is set
out in 2008 Ky. Acts ch. 127.
3
pendency of the action, the circuit court was persuaded that Price’s petition was
moot.
On appeal, Price now raises a new argument, to wit, that he was
improperly denied good time credit (as opposed to sentence credit under HB 406)
based on the 1,995 days he spent on parole. We are persuaded by the
Department’s contention that this argument was not raised below and is not
preserved for appellate review. Price’s petition for a Writ of Mandamus does not
raise or otherwise address any issue of good time credit, and there is nothing in the
circuit court record on this issue. The circuit court made no ruling relating to good
time credit. Our review is limited to issues which were raised in and ruled upon by
the trial court. Commonwealth v. Maricle, 15 S.W.3d 376 (Ky. 2000). Price did
not raise the issue of good time credit before the circuit court, and as such, we are
without the authority to examine it de novo. Arguendo, even if this matter were
properly before us, we would find no error. The award of good time credit is
discretionary. KRS 197.045(1).
The record demonstrates that the Department of Corrections tendered
proof that Price was awarded 1,995 days of credit toward his sentence as required
by HB 406. This proof provides a reasonable basis for the Franklin Circuit Court’s
September 8, 2009 Order dismissing Price’s petition as moot. Accordingly, we
find no error.
For the forgoing reasons, we affirm the Order of the Franklin Circuit
Court.
4
ALL CONCUR.
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
John M. Price, Jr., pro se
Burgin, Kentucky
Jonathan S. Milby
Justice & Public Safety Cabinet
Office of Legal Services
Frankfort, Kentucky
5
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.