MILLER (GEORGE) VS. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: JANUARY 22, 2010; 10:00 A.M.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals
NO. 2008-CA-000217-MR
GEORGE MILLER
v.
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE MARY M. SHAW, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 04-CR-002522
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
APPELLEE
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE: FORMTEXT FORMTEXT COMBS, CHIEF JUDGE; TAYLOR,
JUDGE; HENRY, SENIOR JUDGE.
TAYLOR, JUDGE: George Miller brings this pro se appeal from a November 15,
2007, Order of the Jefferson Circuit Court denying his motion to withdraw guilty
plea. We affirm.
Miller was indicted upon two counts of capital murder, three counts of
wanton endangerment (first degree), one count of operating a motor vehicle under
the influence of intoxicants, and one count of operating a motor vehicle while his
license was revoked or suspended for driving under the influence. The charges
stemmed from a motor vehicle accident. Miller was driving a vehicle while
intoxicated and struck two individuals, resulting in their death. Pursuant to a plea
agreement with the Commonwealth, Miller pleaded guilty to two counts of
manslaughter (second degree), three counts of wanton endangerment (first degree),
operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicants, and one count of
operating a motor vehicle while license was revoked or suspended for driving
under the influence. Pursuant to the plea agreement, Miller was sentenced to a
total of twenty-years’ imprisonment. The final judgment sentencing Miller was
entered on July 11, 2005.
Miller subsequently filed motions for shock probation that were all
denied by the circuit court. In October 2007, some two years after final judgment,
Miller filed a pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The circuit court denied
the motion by order entered November 15, 2007. This appeal follows.
Miller contends that the circuit court erred by denying his motion to
withdraw guilty plea. Specifically, Miller argues that he did not enter into the
guilty plea knowingly and that the Commonwealth coerced him to plead guilty. In
support thereof, Miller argues that he was “misled . . . into believing that he would
get shock probation.” Miller’s Brief at 3.
Under Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure (RCr) 8.10, the circuit
court is vested with broad discretion when considering a motion to withdraw guilty
-2-
plea, especially after final sentence is imposed. Murphy v. Com., 551 S.W.2d 838
(Ky. App. 1977); Franklin v. Com., 305 Ky. 111, 203 S.W.2d 2, (Ky. 1947).
In this case, the terms of the plea agreement were clear as to shock
probation:
[Miller] may file a motion for shock probation as
permitted by the rules of criminal procedure. However,
if [Miller] does file a motion for shock probation he
agrees to serve a full six months in the penitentiary
before being released on shock probation. . . . At the time
that a hearing is necessary to address the motion for
shock probation the Commonwealth will take no
position on shock probation leaving the issue to the
court’s discretion. However, the Commonwealth will
reserve the right to ask the court to hear from the victim’s
family at any hearing held by the court in relation to
[Miller’s] release. If the court, at any time, gives
[Miller], either by shock or otherwise, early release
[Miller] agrees to serve another six months at CCC with
work release. . . . (Emphasis added.)
Under the plea agreement’s unambiguous terms, the Commonwealth promised to
make no recommendation upon shock probation but would leave such decision
within the discretion of the circuit court. The terms of the plea agreement speak
for themselves. Miller was not promised shock probation by the Commonwealth.
Thus, there exists no basis to support Miller’s motion to withdraw guilty plea. In
sum, we hold that the circuit court did not err by denying said motion.
For the foregoing reasons, the Order of the Jefferson Circuit Court is
affirmed.
ALL CONCUR.
-3-
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
George Edward Miller, Pro Se
St. Mary, Kentucky
Jack Conway
Attorney General of Kentucky
Courtney J. Hightower
Assistant Attorney General
Frankfort, Kentucky
-4-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.