VESPER (PAUL J.) VS. HUMPERT (WILLIAM)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: APRIL 17, 2009; 10:00 A.M.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals
NO. 2008-CA-001026-MR
PAUL J. VESPER
v.
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE ROBERT W. MCGINNIS, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 08-CI-00175
WILLIAM HUMPERT, KENTON
COUNTY MASTER COMMISSIONER
APPELLEE
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE: CLAYTON, NICKELL, AND VANMETER, JUDGES.
VANMETER, JUDGE: Paul J. Vesper appeals from the Kenton Circuit Court’s
order dismissing his petition relating to the Kentucky Administrative Office of the
Court’s (AOC’s) denial of his open records request. For the following reasons, we
affirm.
Pursuant to KRS1 426.520(1):
Before any real property is to be sold under an order or
judgment of a court, other than an execution, the
commissioner or other officer selling the property shall
have it appraised, under oath, by two (2) disinterested,
intelligent housekeepers of the county, who may be
sworn by the officer.
On December 27, 2007, Vesper requested from the Kenton County Master
Commissioner, William Humpert, a list of appraisers his office used in 2006 and
2007, how much each appraiser received in total compensation for the year, and
written evidence of each appraiser’s approved individual fee. In early January
2008, AOC’s Office of General Counsel responded to Vesper’s request, on behalf
of the Kenton County Master Commissioner, as follows:
The Kentucky Supreme Court has declared that
records generated by the courts and judicial agencies are
not subject to the Kentucky Open Records Act (KRS
61.870 et. seq.). See Ex parte Farley, Ky., 570 S.W.2d
617 (1978). As noted in Farley, “the custody and control
of records generated by the courts in the course of their
work are inseparable from the judicial function itself and
are not subject to statutory regulation.” Id. at 624. As a
quasi-judicial office, Master Commissioners clearly fall
within the parameters of this case.
Even though the Kentucky court system is not
subject to the Act, it has always strived to honor the
underlying principles of open records law and to provide
access to citizens whenever doing so does not interfere
with the orderly operation of the courts. Mr. Humpert’s
office has told me that the appraisal amounts in Kenton
County are set by General Orders signed by the county’s
circuit judges. The Kenton Circuit Clerk should have a
General Orders file that you could access during regular
office hours to obtain written evidence of the approved
1
Kentucky Revised Statutes.
-2-
fee amounts. Also, judicial sales are a matter of public
record, so if you have questions about the appraiser used
or the amount paid out to them in a particular case, you
can always request access to the specific case file at the
Clerk’s office.
Thereafter, Vesper filed a petition in the Kenton Circuit Court
pursuant to KRS 61.882, seeking “to obtain records of the Master Commissioner
for the Kenton Circuit Court relating to foreclosure proceedings for the years 2006
and 2007, after having been denied.” In his petition, Vesper stated that some of the
information he had requested had been reported to him orally. Still, he sought
“[i]mmediate release of the information requested” as well as a monetary award
and costs.
A special judge was assigned to the matter, and Humpert moved to
dismiss Vesper’s action. The circuit court ultimately dismissed Vesper’s action for
the reasons proffered in Humpert’s motion to dismiss. This appeal followed.
Vesper argues that the circuit court erred by dismissing his petition.
We disagree.
In dismissing Vesper’s petition, the circuit court relied upon Ex parte
Farley, 570 S.W.2d 617, 624 (Ky. 1978), in which the Kentucky Supreme Court
opined that “the custody and control of the records generated by the courts in the
course of their work are inseparable from the judicial function itself, and are not
subject to statutory regulation.” Accordingly, the court denied a public advocate’s
open records request to produce documents, compiled by the AOC, which the court
utilized in evaluating death penalty cases. Still, the court stated that there was
-3-
“very little in the policies evinced by the Open Records Law that we could not
accept as a matter of comity[,]” with certain noted exceptions, and stated that the
records Farley requested would be “open to the public and, perforce, to all who
may be interested, as soon as we have had the occasion and opportunity to examine
and consider them ourselves.” Id. at 625, 627.
A master commissioner “‘acts as the representative and assistant of
the court which appoints him. He is a part of the court, and his official acts are
subject to its control and supervision.’” Sterling Grace Mun. Sec. Corp. v. Central
Bank & Trust Co., 926 S.W.2d 670, 673 (Ky.App. 1996) (quoting Shannon v. Ray,
280 Ky. 31, 132 S.W.2d 545, 547 (1939)). This, combined with the holding in
Farley that the custody and control of the records generated by the courts in the
course of their work are not subject to statutory regulation, compels us to hold that
the circuit court did not err by dismissing Vesper’s petition relating to the denial of
his open records request.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, we note that the AOC complied with
the open records laws by offering Vesper an opportunity to access certain of the
circuit clerk’s records during regular office hours. KRS 61.872(1) provides that
“public records shall be open for inspection by any person,” and subsection (3)(a)
provides that a person may inspect the public records “[d]uring the regular office
hours of the public agency[.]” Alternatively, a public agency may mail copies of
the public records to the person. KRS 61.872(3)(b).
-4-
Vesper’s argument that the circuit court erred by failing to permit him
to depose and obtain documents from Humpert, including the documents he sought
in his open records request, is rendered moot.
The Kenton Circuit Court’s order is affirmed.
ALL CONCUR.
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
Paul J. Vesper, Pro se
Covington, Kentucky
Jack Conway
Attorney General of Kentucky
Stuart W. Cobb
Assistant Attorney General
Frankfort, Kentucky
-5-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.