OLLER (CLETUS RAY) VS. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: AUGUST 21, 2009; 10:00 A.M.
TO BE PUBLISHED
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals
NO. 2008-CA-000977-MR
CLEATUS RAY OLLER
v.
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE RODNEY BURRESS, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 83-CR-00054
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
APPELLEE
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE: MOORE AND NICKELL, JUDGES; HARRIS,1 SENIOR JUDGE.
HARRIS, SENIOR JUDGE: Cleatus Ray Oller, pro se, appeals from the denial of
his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Kentucky Rules of Civil
Procedure (CR) 60.02. He argues that the trial judge lacked authority to entertain
his motion. We affirm.
1
Senior Judge William R. Harris sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice
pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and Kentucky Revised Statutes
(KRS) 21.580.
In 1983, Oller pled guilty to murder in Bullitt Circuit Court and
received a sentence of life imprisonment. The trial court denied Oller’s motion for
post-conviction relief pursuant to Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure (RCr)
11.42. This Court affirmed in a not-to-be published opinion. Oller v.
Commonwealth, 1983-CA-001329-MR (rendered March 13, 1987). In 1990, Oller
filed a motion pursuant to CR 60.01 to correct an error in the judgment. He argued
that the judgment erroneously designated the charge as a capital offense. The trial
court granted Oller’s motion without a hearing and modified the judgment to
reflect that Oller entered a guilty plea to murder and struck the designation of
capital offense.
In June 2006, Oller filed a motion pursuant to CR 60.02 asserting that
his 1983 guilty plea was invalid because it was based on mistake and asserting that
the trial court erred by granting his 60.01 motion in 1990 without an evidentiary
hearing. Oller’s 2006 CR 60.02 motion was denied by Bullitt Circuit Court by an
order entered on May 1, 2008. It is this order from which Oller appeals.
Oller’s primary argument on appeal is that his CR 60.02 motion was
heard and decided by a judge who lacked authority to do so. We have examined
the record, from which we glean the following: Oller’s CR 60.02 motion first
came before Hon. Thomas L. Waller, the then-regular judge of Bullitt Circuit
Court.2 Judge Waller recused by an order entered June 29, 2006. That order
2
The Fifty-fifth Judicial Circuit, comprised of Bullitt County, KRS 23A.020(55), became a twojudge circuit with two numbered divisions effective January 1, 2007. 2006 Kentucky Acts, Ch.
250, Part V, Section 1.
-2-
provided that copies were to be sent to the Chief Regional Judge and to the Senior
Status Judge Program Administrator “. . . for the appointment of the Hon. Steve
Ryan, Senior Judge, to preside further in this case.” The record does not contain
an order appointing Senior Judge Ryan as special judge, but it does contain an
order signed by Judge Ryan on November 22, 2006, allowing Oller to proceed in
forma pauperis. Thereafter, it appears that Hon. Rodney Burress succeeded Judge
Waller as a regular judge of Division I of Bullitt Circuit Court. In that capacity,
and without objection being raised before, during, or after the hearing, Judge
Burress heard Oller’s CR 60.02 motion on December 3, 2007, and denied it by the
order entered on May 1, 2008.
From the state of the record it appears that the procedures for
appointment of a special judge as set forth in KRS 26A.020 were not followed.
That statute calls for the clerk to certify to the Chief Justice the fact of the regular
judge’s inability to act in the case, and then for the Chief Justice3 to designate a
special judge. Had Oller raised objection to Judge Ryan acting in his case between
the date of Judge Waller’s recusal and Judge Burress’ assumption of office as
regular judge, his objection would have had merit. But when Judge Burress
succeeded Judge Waller as regular judge of Bullitt Circuit Court, Judge Burress
became the judge properly acting in the case, and in that capacity he was
authorized to hear and decide Oller’s CR 60.02 motion. Brutley v. Commonwealth,
967 S.W.2d 20 (Ky. 1998).
3
Or the Chief Justice’s designee under the Regional Administration Program Charter or under
the Guidelines for the Senior Status Program for Special Judges.
-3-
We also believe that any objection which Oller might have had to
Judge Burress hearing and ruling on his CR 60.02 motion was waived by his
failure to raise same in the trial court. Bussell v. Commonwealth, 882 S.W.2d 111
(Ky. 1994).
Before turning to the merits of Oller’s remaining arguments, we will
first address his motion’s timeliness. CR 60.02(f) provides that a motion
thereunder “shall be made in a reasonable time.” Oller’s original guilty plea was
entered in 1983. The basis of Oller’s current motion is that the trial court erred by
granting his CR 60.01 motion without a hearing in 1990. Oller did not file the
current CR 60.02 motion until June 2006. Under these circumstances, sixteen
years is simply not a reasonable time. The trial court did not abuse its discretion
by denying Oller’s motion.
Accordingly, the order of the Bullitt Circuit Court is affirmed.
ALL CONCUR.
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
Cleatus Ray Oller, pro se
Eddyville, Kentucky
Jack Conway
Attorney General of Kentucky
Gregory C. Fuchs
Assistant Attorney General
Frankfort, Kentucky
-4-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.