GULF STATES PAPER CORPORATION v. JAMES MOUNCE; LLOYD R. EDENS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED:
SEPTEMBER 14, 2001; 10:00 a.m.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
C ommonwealth O f K entucky
C ourt O f A ppeals
NO.
2001-CA-001061-WC
GULF STATES PAPER CORPORATION
APPELLANT
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION
OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD
ACTION NO. WC-97-72407
v.
JAMES MOUNCE; LLOYD R. EDENS,
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE;
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD
APPELLEES
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE:
COMBS, HUDDLESTON, AND MILLER, JUDGES.
MILLER, JUDGE:
Gulf States Paper Corporation (Gulf States) asks
us to review an opinion of the Workers' Compensation Board
entered April 18, 2001.
Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 342.290.
We affirm.
Gulf States is a manufacturer of folding cartons.
James Mounce, appellee, has been employed by Gulf States since
1973.
For most of that time, Mounce was a gravure press
operator.
His position required lifting 35 to 40 pound buckets
of ink, and 50 to 100 pound dies and plates.
Mounce's job also
included pushing down a lever on an arbor press in order to cut
out the cartons.
In 1984, Mounce was involved in a motor vehicle
accident with injuries to his head and mouth.
he suffered a work-related back injury.
In 1985 or 1986,
After approximately six
weeks off, Mounce returned to his same job without limitations.
In 1990, Mounce was involved in two motor vehicle accidents.
accident resulted in a low back injury.
One
As a result of the motor
vehicle accident injuries, he underwent surgery in 1992.
After
eight to ten weeks of recovery, Mounce returned to the same job
without limitations.
Mounce claims he sustained a low back injury while
working for Gulf States on August 20, 1997.
While engaging the
arbor press lever, he alleges that he felt pain in his back, and
subsequent numbness in his right leg.
He was taken to the
hospital emergency room the night of the incident.
Mounce
followed up with a family physician, who referred him to
neurosurgeon, Magdy El-Kalliny.
Ultimately, Dr. El-Kalliny
assigned a 23% impairment rating using the range of motion (ROM)
model of impairment evaluation.
Dr. El-Kalliny assigned the full
impairment to the August 20, 1997 injury.
Mounce was also evaluated by Dr. Richard T. Sheridan,
an orthopedic surgeon, on March 27, 2000, at the request of Gulf
States.
Dr. Sheridan calculated the 10% impairment rating using
the diagnosis related estimates (DRE) model.
Dr. Sheridan
further calculated a 10% prior active impairment rating as a
-2-
result of the 1990 motor vehicle accident and subsequent surgery,
thus leaving a net impairment rating of zero.
On June 10, 2000, Mounce was seen by Dr. James Templin,
a specialist in occupational medicine.
Dr. Templin assigned an
impairment rating of 25% using the ROM model of impairment
evaluation.
Dr. Templin assigned 8% prior impairment rating as a
result of the 1992 surgery, leaving a net impairment rating of
17% to be assigned to the August 20, 1997 work-related injury.
Mounce's records were also reviewed by Dr. Leon H.
Ensalada, a specialist in occupational environmental medicine.
Dr. Ensalada reviewed Mounce's records back to 1986.
He assigned
a 10% impairment rating based on the DRE model of impairment
evaluation.
Dr. Ensalada also assigned a 10% prior active
impairment rating from the 1990 motor vehicle accident, resulting
in a net impairment rating of zero.
Dr. Ensalada further
concluded that there was no harmful change in Mounce evidenced by
“objective medical findings” arising out of the 1997 work-related
injury.
The ALJ found Mounce was 17% functionally impaired
solely as a result of his August 20, 1997 injury.
The ALJ also
determined the use of the ROM model appropriate in assessing
Mounce's impairment. The Board affirmed the ALJ in an opinion
entered April 18, 2001.
This appeal followed.
Gulf States first contends the Board erred in affirming
the ALJ's determination that Mounce did not have a pre-existing
active impairment from the 1990 motor vehicle accident.
Specifically, Gulf States asserts that Mounce's impairment is
-3-
10%, and, when offset with a 10% pre-existing active impairment
rating, is zero.
On appeal, the issue is whether the ALJ's opinion is
supported by substantial evidence of record.
Wolf Creek
Collieries v. Crum, Ky. App., 673 S.W.2d 735 (1984).
The ALJ, as
fact finder, has the sole authority to determine weight,
credibility, substance of, and inferences to be drawn from, the
evidence.
Paramount Foods, Incorporated, v. Burkhardt, Ky., 695
S.W.2d 418 (1985).
In the case sub judice, four qualified
medical experts offered testimony.
Dr. El-Kalliny determined
there was no pre-existing active impairment and assigned a 23%
impairment rating.
Dr. Templin determined 8% of Mounce's injury
was pre-existing leaving a net 17% impairment rating.
We believe
the above to be substantial evidence to support the ALJ's finding
that Mounce did not suffer an active pre-existing injury.
It is
not enough that Gulf States offered evidence to support a
contrary conclusion.
Cf. McCloud v. Beth-Elkhorn Corporation,
Ky., 514 S.W.2d 46 (1974).
Thus, we perceive no error.
Gulf States next maintains the ALJ erred in weighing
the evidence of functional impairment under the AMA Guides.
Specifically, Gulf States asserts Drs. Templin and El-Kalliny
erroneously used the ROM model of evaluation instead of the DRE
model under the AMA Guides.
The ALJ, as fact finder, has the
sole authority to determine weight, credibility, substance of,
and inferences to be drawn from, the evidence.
695 S.W.2d 418.
Paramount Foods,
It is undisputed the AMA Guides indicate use of
the ROM model in situations where it is unclear into which
-4-
category a patient belongs.
In his July 20, 2000 report, Dr.
Templin points out that the DRE categories do not adequately
cover Mounce's injuries.
It is apparent from that report that
Mounce's diagnosis was not limited to a single condition.
We
think the above evidence alone constitutes substantial evidence
to support the ALJ's determination that the use of the ROM model
by Dr. Templin was appropriate.
Gulf States next avers that Mounce did not suffer
“injury” as defined by KRS 342.0011(1), which reads, in pertinent
part:
“Injury” means any work-related traumatic
event or series of traumatic events,
including cumulative trauma, arising out of
and in the course of employment which is the
proximate cause producing a harmful change in
the human organism evidenced by objective
medical findings.
Specifically, Gulf States complains that there are no “objective
medical findings” as defined by KRS 342.0011(33), which reads:
“Objective medical findings” means
information gained through direct observation
and testing of the patient applying objective
or standardized methods.
In Dr. El-Kalliny's operative report, he indicates he
observed a broken articular facet on the right side with a piece
of the facet indenting the L5 nerve root.
Dr. Templin was of the
opinion this occurred during the work incident.
Because Dr. El-
Kalliny's report was based on his direct observation, the ALJ
concluded the observations in the report to be objective medical
findings under KRS 342.0011(33).
We agree with the ALJ.
We
conclude that Dr. El-Kalliny's report of his direct observation
constitutes an objective medical finding under KRS 342.0011(33).
-5-
We believe the above constitutes substantial evidence
to support the ALJ's conclusion that Dr. El-Kalliny's observation
constitute objective medical findings under KRS 342.0011(33).
Thus, we affirm the opinion of the Board under the
precepts of Western Baptist Hospital v. Kelly, Ky., 827 S.W.2d
685 (1992).
For the foregoing reasons, the opinion the Workers'
Compensation Board is affirmed.
ALL CONCUR.
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE, JAMES
MOUNCE:
W. Barry Lewis
Hazard, Kentucky
Mark D. Knight
Somerset, Kentucky
-6-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.