State v. Breitenbach
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's convictions of attempted capital murder, aggravated criminal sodomy, and aggravated burglary, holding that there were no errors in the proceedings below.
Specifically, the Supreme Court held (1) the district court did not err in denying Defendant's request for independent DNA testing; (2) the district court did not err in denying Defendant's request for new appointed counsel; (3) the district court did not err in denying Defendant's request for standby counsel; and (4) the State did not violate Defendant's due process rights under Brady by failing to disclose evidence of fingerprint testing.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.