State v. Davisson
Annotate this CaseIn 2000, Defendant pled guilty to felony murder, aggravated kidnapping, and aggravated robbery. In 2011, Defendant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea under Kan. Stat. Ann. 22-3210(d). The district court dismissed the motion without considering the merits due to Defendant’s late filing and his failure to show excusable neglect. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Defendant did not establish excusable neglect for the untimely filing of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and by dismissing Defendant’s motion as untimely without considering its merits.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.