In re Harding
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
No. 103,195
In the Matter of DAVID J. HARDING,
Respondent.
ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT
On January 22, 2010, this court suspended the respondent, David J. Harding, from
the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 90 days. See In re Harding, 290 Kan. 81,
223 P.3d 303 (2010). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs
of the disciplinary action and comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2009 Kan. Ct. R.
Annot. 361). The Disciplinary Administrator's office has verified that the respondent has
fully complied with the conditions imposed upon him. The court finds that the
respondent, David J. Harding, should be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of
Kansas.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent be reinstated to the practice
of law in the state of Kansas effective the date of this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order of reinstatement shall be published in
the official Kansas Reports.
DATED this 4th day of May, 2010.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
