In re Pyle
Annotate this CaseIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
No. 96,579
In The Matter of E. THOMAS PYLE, III,
Respondent.
ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT
On April 27, 2007, this court suspended the respondent, E. Thomas Pyle, III, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 3 months. See In re Pyle, 283 Kan. 807, 156 P.3d 1231 (2007). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action.
The Disciplinary Administrator's office has verified that the respondent has fully complied with the conditions imposed upon him by this court. This court finds that the respondent, E. Thomas Pyle, III, should be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas as of the date of this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order of reinstatement shall be published in the official Kansas Reports.
DATED this 27th day of July, 2007.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
