DANIEL LOPATKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CITY OF IOWA CITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 3-575 / 12-1179 Filed July 24, 2013 DANIEL LOPATKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CITY OF IOWA CITY, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Denver D. Dillard, Judge. Daniel Lopatka appeals the district court s dismissal of his personal injury claim against the City of Iowa City. AFFIRMED. Daniel R. Lopatka, Iowa City, appellant pro se. Eric R. Goers, Assistant City Attorney, Iowa City, for appellee. Considered by Doyle, P.J., and Danilson and Mullins, JJ. 2 MULLINS, J. Daniel Lopatka appeals from the district court order dismissing his personal injury claim against the City of Iowa City. Lopatka contends the district court erred in finding his claim was time-barred because the applicable statute of limitations should run from the date a medical professional diagnosed his injury. We are called upon to review when the applicable statute of limitations began to run under the circumstances presented in this case. Appellate review of a ruling on a motion to dismiss is for correction of errors at law. Rieff v. Evans, 630 N.W.2d 278, 284 (Iowa 2001). Pursuant to Iowa Code section 614.1(2) (2011), a plaintiff must bring a personal injury claim within two years of the alleged injury. On July 16, 2009, Lopatka fell from his bicycle. Following the accident, Lopatka was in pain and could not move his shoulder. On July 30, 2009, a chiropractor diagnosed Lopatka with a shoulder injury. On July 29, 2011, Lopatka filed his personal injury claim alleging Iowa City s poor design, oversight, and construction of a sidewalk caused his injury. Thus, if the statute of limitations runs from the date of the accident, his claim is time-barred; if the statute of limitations runs from the date of diagnosis, his claim is not time-barred. Under the discovery rule, the applicable statute of limitations begins to run when the injured party has actual or imputed knowledge of the facts that would support a cause of action. See Franzen v. Deere & Co., 337 N.W.2d 660, 662 (Iowa 1985). We find Lopatka had actual or imputed knowledge of the facts that would support a personal injury cause of action on July 16, 2009. Accordingly, 3 Loptaka s claim is time-barred. See Iowa Code ยง 614.1(2). We affirm without further opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(a) and (e). AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
