Pekin Insurance Company v. Xdata Solutions

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

2011 IL App (1st) 102769 FIRST DIVISION September 30, 2011 No. 1-10-2769 PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. XDATA SOLUTIONS, INC., an Indiana Corporation and TARGIN SIGN SYSTEMS, INC., an Illinois Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County No. 09 CH 15303 Honorable Stuart E. Palmer, Judge Presiding. JUSTICE KARNEZIS delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Presiding Justice Hoffman and Justice Hall concurred in the judgment and opinion. OPINION ¶1 Plaintiff-appellant Pekin Insurance Company appeals from an order of the circuit court in favor of defendants-appellees XData Solutions, Inc., and Targin Sign Systems, Inc., finding that Pekin had a duty to defend and indemnify XData in an underlying class action lawsuit filed by Targin. On appeal, Pekin contends: (1) it had no duty to defend XData in the underlying lawsuit because the "advertising injury" provision in the insurance policy did not apply to alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) (47 U.S.C. § 227 (2006)); (2) it had no duty to defend XData

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.