Hoch v. Vance
Annotate this CaseRob and Becky Vance appealed a district court order that granted partial summary judgment to John and Carole Hoch. The Vances challenged that part of the court's decision holding the Hochs' warranty deed granted them an easement over the "upper road." Alternatively, the Vances argued that the district court erred in finding that the warranty deed was unambiguous. The Vances and Hochs were each conveyed a portion of the original grantor's property, and each received a warranty deed that contained a number of provisions concerning easements. Ultimately, this case centered on the interpretation of those easements. Upon review of the district court record, the Supreme Court concluded the district court did not err in its decision. Accordingly, it affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.