Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000011 27-MAY-2016 08:12 AM SCWC-16-0000011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I RAEVYN WAIKIKI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, vs. HO#OMAKA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS, Respondent/Defendant-Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee, and VIOLET JHUN, Petitioner/Defendant-Cross-Claim Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and WADE KIOSHI KALEOLANI SHIMOJO, Respondent/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000011; CIV. NO. 13-1-2391-09) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner Violet Jhun’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 14, 2016, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 27, 2016. Walter R. Schoettle for petitioner Violet Jhun Richard Turbin, Rai Saint Chu, and Janice D. Heidt for respondent Wade Kioshi Kaleolani Shimojo /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.