Davis v. Vancil

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000999 02-DEC-2015 08:07 AM SCWC-11-0000999 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ________________________________________________________________ SAINGOEN DAVIS, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. GARY W. VANCIL; MARK VAN PERNIS; VAN PERNIS-VANCIL, A Law Corporation, Petitioners/Defendants/Cross-Claim Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and NICHOLLE DAVIS, Respondent/Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000999; CIV. NO. 08-1-352K) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioners/Defendants/Cross-Claim PlaintiffsAppellees/Cross-Appellants Gary W. Vancil, Mark Van Pernis, and Van Pernis-Vancil, a Law Corporation’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 16, 2015, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, December 2, 2015. Keith K. Hiraoka, James Shin, and Jodie D. Roeca for petitioners /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna James J. Bickerton for respondent Saingoen Davis /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.