Waiehu Aina, LLC v. Raffetto

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 30215 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI» I WAIEHU AINA, LLC, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE SHACKLEY F. RAFFETTO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI» I; KUO KANG KAO; and HSIU MEI CHANG, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 09-1-0046) ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.) Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by petitioner Waiehu Aina, LLC and the papers in support, it appears that the August 6, 2009 interlocutory decree of foreclosure is reviewable on appeal from a final judgment entered in Civil No. 09-1-0046. Petitioner can appeal from the final judgment and can seek a stay of the foreclosure pending appeal pursuant to HRAP 8. to mandamus relief. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai» i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures.). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai» i, December 16, 2009. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.