Tataii v. Chandler
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 24931 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ STEVE TATAII, Appellant-Appellant, vs. SUSAN CHANDLER, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Appellee-Appellee. _________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 00-1-2277) (By: ORDER Levinson, J.) Upon consideration of Appellant Steve Tataii s motion for retention of oral argument or motion for extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration of the decision filed on June 21, 2002. the papers in support, and the records and files herein, it appears that this appeal was dismissed on June 13, 2002 for lack of appellate jurisdiction and a motion for reconsideration was denied on June 21, 2002. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for retention of oral argument is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the alternative motion for extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration is denied. See HRAP Rule 40(e) (only one motion for reconsideration may be filed by any party). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 1, 2002. STEVEN H. LEVINSON Associate Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
