Cedillos v. The Balloon Man
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 24014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I PHILIP HENRY CEDILLOS, dba Maui Balloon Co., Plaintiff-Appellant vs. THE BALLOON MAN, BALLOON CO. LTD., ROB RISHMAWY, ROGER SIMOND, RANDALL LITTLETON and JOHN DOES 1-5, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-5, ROE CORPORATIONS 1-5, ROE PARTNERSHIPS 1-5, ROE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 1-5, and ROE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 1-5, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CIV. NO. W98-1614) SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) In accordance with Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 35, and after carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and duly considering and analyzing the law relevant to the arguments and issues raised by the parties, we conclude no error was committed by the district court of the second circuit (the court)1 in confirming the award of costs to Defendants-Appellees The Balloon Man, Balloon Co. Ltd., Rob Rishmawy, Roger Simond, and Randall Littleton, and in denying the 1 The Honorable Rhonda Lai Loo presided over this matter. motion of Plaintiff-Appellant Philip Henry Cedillos, dba Maui Balloon Co., to disqualify the trial judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court s December 11, 2000 order granting relief from attorney s fees but denying relief from costs awarded, and its December 11, 2000 order denying the motion to disqualify, from which the appeal is taken, are affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 7, 2002. On the briefs: Philip Henry Cedillos, plaintiff-appellant pro se. Douglas J. Sameshima for defendants-appellees. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
