State v. Bundy
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23857 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. BARRY WENDELL BUNDY, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CASE NOS. TR. 12, 42-43: 10/13/00) SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) In accordance with Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 35, and after carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and duly considering and analyzing the law relevant to the arguments and issues raised by the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the district court of the second circuit1 filed on October 13, 2000, from which the appeal is taken, is affirmed, inasmuch as the oral advisement given by Officer William Hankins to DefendantAppellant Barry Wendell Bundy corrected any error in the information provided on the DUI implied consent form. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 9, 2002. Steven Booth Songstad for defendant-appellant. Simone C. Polak (Arleen Y. Watanabe on the brief), Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, County of Maui, for plaintiffappellee. 1 The Honorable Douglas Ige presided over this matter.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
