Mauna Kea Agribusiness Co., Inc. v. Naluahi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NO. 25642 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I MAUNA KEA AGRIBUSINESS CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NALUAHI, et al., Defendant-Appellee, and JOSEPHINE H. RABAGO, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT (CIVIL NO. 02-1-228) (By: SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER Watanabe, Acting C.J., Lim and Foley, JJ.) Defendant-Appellant Josephine H. Rabago (Rabago) appeals the Final Judgment filed on January 30, 2003 in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit (circuit court).1 On appeal, Rabago contends the circuit court erred by granting Plaintiff-Appellee Mauna Kea Agribusiness Co., Inc.'s (Mauna Kea) Summary Judgment Motion and by denying her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Summary Judgment. Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we hold that the circuit court did not err by granting Mauna Kea's Summary Judgment Motion and denying Rabago's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Summary Judgment because Rabago did not present 1 The Honorable Greg K. Nakamura presided. NOT FOR PUBLICATION evidence that created a genuine issue of material fact. Fujimoto v. Au, 95 Hawai#i 116, 136-37, 19 P.3d 699, 719-20 (2001). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Final Judgment filed on January 30, 2003 in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit is affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 26, 2004. On the briefs: Josephine H. Rabago, defendant-appellant pro se. Donald Sceare (Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright) for plaintiff-appellee. Acting Chief Judge Associate Judge Associate Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
