Harker v. Shamoto, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ---o0o-- DR. GEORGE R. HARKER, Appellant-Appellant, v. JUDITH SHAMOTO, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; PATRICIA HAMAMOTO, SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and ROBYN HONDA, PERSONAL SPECIALIST FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, AppelleesAppellees NO. 25615 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 02-1-0370(2)) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Burns, C.J., Lim and Nakamura, JJ.) Appellant George R. Harker's Rule 40 Motion for Reconsideration, filed on May 28, 2004, is denied as the motion was untimely filed. May 14, 2004. The opinion of the court was filed on The ten days within which to file a motion for reconsideration expired on May 24, 2004. The denial of this motion does not preclude Appellant from filing an application for writ of certiorari in the Hawai#i Supreme Court in accordance with Rule 40.1 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 2, 2004. Dr. George R. Harker, Appellant Pro Se, on the motion. Chief Judge Associate Judge Associate Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.