AOAO of Kalama Terrace v. Hamilton

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 22563 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KALAMA TERRACE, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. AVANELL M. HAMILTON, Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellant, GE CAPITAL HAWAII, INC., a Hawaii corporation; DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI#I; and REAL PROPERTY DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, COUNTY OF MAUI, Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants, JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants, and ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY OF HAWAII, INC., a Hawaii corporation, Defendant/Counterclaimant Cross-Claimant-Appellee, v. RENEE U. ELABAN-NORTH, CHARLENE GREENE and JOYCELYN W. UNCIANO, Add l Cross-Claimant Defendants-Appellants, JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Add l Cross-Claim Defendants APPEAL FROM THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT (CIVIL NO. 98-0135(3)) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Burns, C.J., Watanabe and Lim, JJ.) Defendants-Appellants Avanell M. Hamilton, Renee U. Elaban-North, Charlene Greene, and Joycelyn W. Unciano (collectively Defendants-Appellants) seek a reconsideration of our Summary Disposition Order filed on June 19, 2001, and hereby bring their motion filed on June 29, 2001, and entitled, Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification of the Summary Disposition Order dated June 19, 2001 for the: (1) Affirmed Order Denying Defendants-Appellants Motion to Dismiss: Conjunction with (2) Standing. September 8, 1998 in Also No Discernible Argument to Address (4) [sic] Unfair Deceptive Trade Practice, HRS 480-12. Upon consideration of the memorandum in support of the motion, and the records and files in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, July 5, 2001. On the motion: Avanell M. Hamilton, defendant/cross-claim defendant-appellant, pro se and Joycelyn W. Unciano, Renee U. Elaban-North, Charlene Greene, add l cross-claimant defendants-appellants, pro se. Chief Judge Associate Judge Associate Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.