BECC V. RACHTANOV, ET AL.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2011 Opinion filed August 17, 2011. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D10-2684 Lower Tribunal No. 09-85098 ________________ BECC Holding II, Inc., Appellant, vs. Ilya Rachtanov, et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge. Michael Farrar, for appellant. R.A. Cuevas, Jr., Miami-Dade County Attorney, and James K. Kracht and Jorge Martinez-Esteve, Assistant County Attorneys; Ilian Rashtanov (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees. Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and EMAS, JJ. SUAREZ, J. BECC Holding II, Inc. ( BECC ), appeals a final order disbursing funds as a result of a tax deed sale. We affirm pursuant to section 197.582(2), Florida Statutes (2010), which permits excess proceeds remaining after a tax deed sale to be used to pay off any lien of record held by a governmental unit against the property. On August 19, 2009, a condominium owned by BECC was sold at a MiamiDade County tax deed sale due to the failure of BECC to pay the property taxes. Appellee, Ilya Rachtanov ( Rachtanov ), purchased the condominium for $40,000 as the highest bidder and received a tax deed from Miami-Dade County. Following the sale, $22,416.45 remained as surplus funds in the registry of the court. At the time of the purchase of the condominium at the tax deed sale, an outstanding tax certificate existed encumbering the property. The certificate was issued by Miami-Dade County for unpaid 2008 property taxes. On March 23, 2010, Rachtanov redeemed the 2008 tax certificate by paying $5,190.45 to the tax collector. On September 21, 2010, Rachtanov filed a supplemental motion for reimbursement from surplus for his payment to redeem the 2008 tax certificate. The trial court granted the motion and held that the 2008 tax certificate was a lien of record held by a governmental unit against the property, and that, accordingly, the 2008 certificate must be redeemed from the surplus funds from the tax deed sale. We agree. 2 As tax certificates can only be enforced through the tax collector, cannot be validly transferred without the endorsement of the tax collector, and are subject to redemption by payment of back taxes to the tax collector, the 2008 tax certificate was a governmental lien under section 197.582(2). As tax certificates are assessible by searching the public records on the County s property tax roll, the 2008 tax certificate was a lien of record. ยง 197.582(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). Therefore, the ruling of the trial court was correct and we affirm the order below. Affirmed. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
