BENITEZ V. BENITEZ
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2008 Opinion filed February 13, 2008. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D07-1472 Lower Tribunal No. 98-5872 ________________ Manuel Benitez, Appellant, vs. Odalis D. Benitez, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joel H. Brown, Judge. Stephen Rakusin, for appellant. Robert D. Hertzberg; Law Offices Greene, Smith & Associates, P.A., and Cynthia L. Greene, for appellee. Before COPE and RAMIREZ, JJ., and PALMER, Associate Judge. COPE, J. The question before us is whether a provision in a marital settlement agreement waiving the right to modification of alimony means what it says. We conclude that it does, and affirm the order below. During their proceeding for dissolution of marriage, the parties entered into a Marital Settlement Agreement. The Agreement requires the former husband to pay to the former wife non-modifiable alimony, which terminates upon her remarriage, the death of either party, or after fifteen years, whichever occurs first. Remarriage is defined as a ceremonial marriage. Both parties waived the right to seek modification of alimony. The Agreement included a provision that the former husband shall not apply to any court for a modification of the aforesaid alimony provision or any judgment or decree into which the provisions of this Agreement shall be incorporated with respect to alimony or spousal support to be paid by the Husband to the Wife whether pursuant to Section 61.14[,] Florida Statutes[,] or any other provision or authority. The Marital Settlement Agreement was executed by the parties and incorporated into the final judgment of dissolution of marriage in 1999. In 2007, the former husband filed an Aamended Petition for Downward Modification of Alimony. The trial court dismissed the Petition for Modification. The former husband has appealed. 2 Boiled down, the former husband says that the former wife has additional financial resources which have become available to her and that her alimony should be reduced. The specific theories need not be addressed. The former husband agreed not to seek modification for any reason. He is in breach of his obligations by moving for modification. The trial court correctly dismissed the petition. See Ferraro v. Ferraro, 891 So. 2d 1211, 1212 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Affirmed. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
