CENTANO V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, 2006 TEOFILO BERMUDEZ CENTANO, ** Appellant, ** vs. ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. CASE NO. 3D06-2601 ** ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 93-43198 ** Opinion filed December 20, 2006. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David H. Young, Judge. Teofilo Bermudez Centano, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee. Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ. ROTHENBERG, Judge. Teofilo B. Centano ( defendant ) appeals the trial court s order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), as repetitious. As the order provided by the defendant contains no attachments, we are unable to provide meaningful review. We, therefore, reverse and remand for the issuance of a new order with the record attachments that conclusively defendant s claims, if the motion is denied. refute the See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D)(requiring reversal by this court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief). Reversed and remanded. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.