Harris v. State
Annotate this CaseThis was the second time this case was before the Supreme Court. In the Court's previous decision, the Court quashed the court of appeal's decision, holding that the trial court should have granted Defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of Defendant's truck, holding that law enforcement officers lacked probable cause where "the fact that a drug-detection dog has been trained and certified to detect narcotics, standing alone, is not sufficient to demonstrate the reliability of the dog." The U.S. Supreme Court reversed, holding that because the training records established the dog's reliability in detecting drugs in this case, and because Defendant failed to undermine that showing, the police officer had probable cause to search Defendant's truck. On remand, the Florida Supreme Court withdrew its prior opinion and approved of the court of appeal's decision in Harris I.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.