Richard A. Nix v. Brenda W. Nix
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC06-1326 ____________ RICHARD A. NIX, Petitioner, vs. BRENDA W. NIX, Respondent. [May 31, 2007] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Nix v. Nix, 930 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), in which the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance: IS A SPOUSE WHO IS AWARDED A PORTION OF THE OTHER SPOUSE S PENSION AT THE TIME OF DISSOLUTION ENTITLED TO SHARE IN A DROP ACCOUNT CREATED, INCLUDING INTEREST AND COLAS, SOMETIME AFTER THE DISSOLUTION HAS BECOME FINAL? Id. at 714. However, upon further consideration, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. The issue certified is not applicable to this case and any decision by this Court would only be advisory. See State v. Schebel, 723 So. 2d 830, 830 (Fla. 1999); Interlachen Lakes Estates, Inc. v. Brooks, 341 So. 2d 993, 995 (Fla. 1976). In addition, the issue involving the formula to be used to determine the retirement share of the wife was resolved by the parties in their stipulation. For these reasons, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered. LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs in result only. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Great Public Importance First District - Case No. 1D04-4766 (Escambia County) Ross A. Keene of Beroset and Keene, Pensacola, Florida, for Petitioner Phillip S. Howell and Ryan Pedraza of Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr and Smith, P.L.C., Gulf Breeze, Florida, for Respondent -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
