William Sweet v. State of Florida
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida THURSDAY, JULY 1, 2004 CASE NO.: SC03-1818 Lower Tribunal No.: 91-2899CFA WILLIAM SWEET vs. Appellant(s) STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee(s) This matter is before the Court under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.142(b), on a petition to review the trial court's nonfinal order replacing the former Capital Collateral Counsel-North (CCRC-North) attorney with different registry counsel. Sweet, who is under a sentence of death, has a first successive rule 3.850 motion pending before the trial court. Appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings was necessitated by the unique circumstance of the defunding of CCRC-North pursuant to a pilot program for the 2004 fiscal year. Having considered the arguments of the parties, this Court remands the case to the trial court to comply with the requirements of section 27.710(5), Florida Statutes (2003), to wit: The trial court must issue an order of appointment which contains specific findings that the appointed counsel meets the statutory requirements and has the high ethical standards necessary to represent a person sentenced to death. In all other respects, the petition is denied. PARIENTE, C.J., and ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, C.J., concurs with an opinion, in which ANSTEAD, J., concurs. WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. A True Copy Test: jn Served: D. TODD DOSS MEREDITH CHARBULA FRANK J. TASSONE, JR. HON. JIM FULLER, CLERK HON. FREDERICK TYGART, JUDGE HON. HARRY L. SHORSTEIN 2 PARIENTE, C.J., concurring. I concur in the remand in this case. Strict adherence to the statutory requirement of findings supporting the appointment of registry counsel is even more important in a case such as this, in which the trial court appointed counsel other than Sweet's former CCRC-North counsel, with whom Sweet had an established and ongoing relationship. ANSTEAD, J., concurs. WELLS, J., dissenting. I dissent from the order remanding this case because I conclude that the trial court s order on rehearing substantially complies with section 27.710(5), Florida Statutes. I would dismiss the petition to review on its merits and allow this case to proceed with counsel appointed by the trial court. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
