David Dionne v. State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC02-1290 ____________ DAVID DIONNE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [January 22, 2004] PER CURIAM. We originally accepted jurisdiction to review State v. Dionne, 814 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we have determined not to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction in this case. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered. ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Constitutional Construction Fifth District - Case No. 5D01-1087 (Sumter County) James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Petitioner Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Mary G. Jolley and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.