S. E. University of The Health Sciences v. Sharick

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC01-969 ____________ SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES, INC., etc., Petitioner, vs. KEITH M. SHARICK, Respondent. [June 27, 2002] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Sharick v. Southeastern University of the Health Sciences, Inc., 780 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with Douglas Fertilizers & Chemical, Inc. v. McClung Landscaping, Inc., 459 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Upon reflection and further consideration, we now conclude that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Third District - Case No. 3D98-2674 (Dade County) John Beranek of Ausley & McMullen, Tallahassee, Florida; and Thomas Panza and Mark Hendricks of Panza, Maurer,Maynard & Neel, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Petitioner Richard A Barnett, Hollywood, Florida; and Donald A. Tobkin, M.D., Hollywood, Florida, for Respondent Stephen H. Grimes and Susan L. Kelsey of Holland & Knight LLP, Tallahassee, Florida, for University of Miami, The Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida, and The American Council on Education, Amici Curiae Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida; and Kathryn Johnston, Vero Beach, Florida, for The Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Amicus Curiae -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.