Florida Insurance Guaranty Association v. Rodriguez
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA June 17, 2015 FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, ) ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Case No. 2D13-5451 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellee's motion for certification is granted. The prior opinion dated February 25, 2015, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is issued in its place. I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER. JAMES BIRKHOLD, CLERK NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, ) ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Case No. 2D13-5451 Opinion filed June 17, 2015. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; W. Lowell Bray, Judge. Hinda Klein and Diane H. Tutt of Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Schefer, P.A., Hollywood, for Appellant. Robert E. Biasotti, Annette Marie Lang, and Christine R. O'Shea of Biasotti and Associates, St. Petersburg, for Appellee. KELLY, Judge. In this nonfinal appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(3)(C)(iv), Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (FIGA) challenges the trial court order compelling it to participate in appraisal of a sinkhole claim. For the reasons expressed by this court in Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. de la Fuente, 158 So. 3d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015), we reverse the order compelling appraisal and remand for further proceedings. As in de la Fuente, we certify the following questions to the Florida Supreme Court as questions of great public importance: I. DOES THE DEFINITION OF "COVERED CLAIM" IN SECTION 631.54(3), FLORIDA STATUTES, EFFECTIVE MAY 17, 2011, APPLY TO A SINKHOLE LOSS UNDER A HOMEOWNERS' POLICY THAT WAS ISSUED BY AN INSURER BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NEW DEFINITION WHEN THE INSURER WAS ADJUDICATED TO BE INSOLVENT AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NEW DEFINITION? II. DOES THE STATUTORY PROVISION LIMITING FIGA'S MONETARY OBLIGATION TO THE AMOUNT OF ACTUAL REPAIRS FOR A SINKHOLE LOSS PRECLUDE AN INSURED FROM OBTAINING AN APPRAISAL AWARD DETERMINING THE "AMOUNT OF LOSS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE HOMEOWNERS' POLICY OF INSURANCE? Reversed and remanded for further proceedings; questions certified. CRENSHAW and BLACK, JJ., Concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
