MDG Helmerich, LLC v. Regions Bank

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MDG HELMERICH, LLC, MDG CAPITAL ) CORPORATION, W. PATRICK McCUAN, ) and WILLIAM L. KLOHN, ) ) Appellants/Cross-Appellees, ) ) v. ) ) REGIONS BANK, as successor by merger ) to AmSouth Bank, ) ) Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ) __________________________________ ) Opinion filed August 14, 2013. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Lee County; H. Andrew Swett, Acting Circuit Judge, and Michael McHugh, Judge. Jon D. Parrish and Kirt R. Posthuma of Parrish, Lawhon & Yarnell, P.A., Naples, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Cathy S. Reiman and Christopher D. Donovan of Roetzel & Andress, LPA, Naples, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant. NORTHCUTT, Judge. Case No. 2D12-2658 This appeal raises postjudgment discovery issues similar to those we addressed in a companion case, Regions Bank v. MDG Frank Helmerich, LLC, 2D122427 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 14, 2013). While this case involves a different commercial loan, the facts are similar: Regions Bank's predecessor lent money to MDG Frank Helmerich, LLC, and the loan was guaranteed by W. Patrick McCuan and William M. Klohn. After the borrower and the guarantors defaulted, Regions obtained a judgment against them. Regions then sought discovery of the guarantors' assets in aid of execution. We affirm the circuit court's order on the debtors' objections to the bank's notice of production from non-parties, with one exception. The order denied discovery of some matters based on the other circuit court judge's order in the companion case. We reversed that order in part in Regions Bank, 2D12-2427. We also reverse the order in this case to the extent that it was grounded on the other judge's order. We remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in the companion case. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. WALLACE and LaROSE, JJ., Concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.