Duckett v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA December 27, 2006. THOMAS P. DUCKETT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Case No: 2D06-658 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellant's "motion for rehearing; clarification; certification" is treated as a motion for rehearing and is granted. Appellant's motion for rehearing en banc is stricken. The opinion dated October 4, 2006, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is substituted therefore. I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER. JAMES BIRKHOLD, CLERK cc: Thomas P. Duckett Attorney General NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT THOMAS P. DUCKETT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) ) v. ) ) ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Case No. 2D06-658 Opinion filed December 27, 2006. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Ronald N. Ficarrotta, Judge. PER CURIAM. In light of Mr. Duckett's motion for rehearing, we have reviewed the claims raised in his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in their entirety, and we conclude that none presents a basis for relief. Therefore, we affirm. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, STRINGER, and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
