EZEKIAL REGISTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA EZEKIEL REGISTER, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D06-4521 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ___________________________/ Opinion filed December 15, 2006. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Augustus D. Aikens, Jr., Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Dan B. Hendrickson and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Alexandria Walters, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The appellant, Ezekiel Register, appeals an order of involuntary inpatient placement under section 394.467, Florida Statutes (2006). The appellant argues, among other things, that counsel s waiver of the appellant s presence at the commitment hearing was insufficient to allow the hearing to proceed. The state asserts that this issue was not preserved for review. A patient has a fundamental right to be present at a commitment proceeding. Joehnk v. State, 689 So. 2d 1179, 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). While a patient may waive his or her right to be personally present and be constructively present through counsel, a court must certify through proper inquiry that the waiver is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Id. Furthermore, a denial of the due process right to be present at an involuntary commitment hearing is fundamental error which may be raised on appeal even if not preserved below. See Ibur v. State, 765 So. 2d 275, 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (holding that a denial of the due process right to be heard prior to the deprivation of one s liberty is fundamental error). Because the court below did not certify through proper inquiry that the waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, we reverse and remand for a new commitment hearing. REVERSED and REMANDED. BROWNING, C.J., DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.