CLAYTON E. LINKOUS v. BRENDA J. LINKOUS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CLAYTON E. LINKOUS, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D06-0575 BRENDA J. LINKOUS, Appellee. ___________________________/ Opinion filed November 8, 2006. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Terry D. Terrell, Judge. John H. Adams and Charles P. Hoskin of Emmanuel, Sheppard and Condon, Pensacola, for Appellant. Ross A. Keene of Beroset & Keene, Pensacola, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant challenges the trial court s order finding that there was a valid contract between the parties. We affirm the trial court s order as to the validity of the contract, the finding that Appellant breached the contract, and the award of arrearages. We reverse only the trial court s grant of specific performance. Specific performance is an appropriate remedy only when there is no adequate remedy at law. Castigliano v. O Connor, 911 So. 2d 145, 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Because Appellee has an adequate remedy at law through a cause of action for breach of contract, specific performance is not an appropriate remedy in this case. See City of Cocoa v. Sullivan Packing Co., 167 So. 2d 750, 752 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. BROWNING, C.J., KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
