RON HOWARD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RON HOWARD, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v. CASE NO. 1D04-1758 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ___________________________/ Opinion filed May 27, 2005. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County. William L. Gary, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General; Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. In this direct appeal from convictions imposed for kidnapping to inflict bodily harm or to terrorize and felony battery, appellant claims that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erred in admitting the hearsay testimony of a deputy sheriff to whom the victim, who was unavailable for trial, excitedly uttered her claims against appellant. The circumstances under which the excited utterances were given in this case meet the third definition of testimonial hearsay as set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004). Therefore, admitting the hearsay violated appellant s Confrontation rights. See Lopez v. State, 888 So. 2d 693, 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Although the permissible evidence of guilt was substantial, it cannot be said, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the impermissible evidence did not affect the jury s verdict. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129, 1136 (Fla. 1986). Accordingly, we reverse appellant s convictions and remand for a new trial. DAVIS, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
