ERICA N. FLUHART vs BRANDON L. RASMUSSEN
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-2579 LT Case No. 2020-DR-000750-FM _____________________________ ERICA N. FLUHART, Appellant, v. BRANDON L. RASMUSSEN, Appellee. _____________________________ On Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Suzanne Bass, Judge. Michael R. Yokan, of Law Office of Michael R. Yokan, Jacksonville, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. April 4, 2024 EN BANC KILBANE, J. Erica Fluhart timely appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage rendered by the trial court in which the court accepted and adopted the report and recommended final judgment of dissolution of the parties’ marriage submitted by the General Magistrate (“GM”) following evidentiary hearings. We affirm; but we have elected to consider this matter en banc to recede, in part, from our decision in Gatchell v. Kryvosheia, 370 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023). Here, after the trial court entered its order adopting the GM’s report and recommended final judgment of dissolution of marriage, Fluhart timely filed her notice of appeal without first moving under Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.490(e)(3) to vacate the order. In Gatchell, under sufficiently similar circumstances, our court held that an appellant’s failure to file a motion to vacate the recommended order under this rule constituted a failure to preserve issues for appellate review. Id. at 375–76. We dismissed the appeal, concluding that the appellant’s failure to preserve issues for appellate review by filing this motion constituted a failure to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Id. On further consideration, we find our conclusion in Gatchell that we lacked jurisdiction to be error; and we now specifically recede from that portion of the opinion. We do, however, affirm the instant final judgment because, under Gatchell, Fluhart’s failure to move to vacate the GM’s recommended final judgment adopted by the trial court resulted in a failure to preserve for appellate review her claimed error involving the court-ordered time-sharing and shared parental responsibility of the parties’ minor child. AFFIRMED. EDWARDS, C.J., and MAKAR, WALLIS, LAMBERT, JAY, EISNAUGLE, HARRIS, SOUD, BOATWRIGHT, MACIVER, and PRATT, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
