EMILY RAONA NUNEZ vs BRANDON RAONA
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED EMILY RAONA NUNEZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-1268 LT Case No. 2017-DR-15425-O BRANDON RAONA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 30, 2022 Nonfinal Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Michael Kraynick, Judge. Gary S. Israel, of Gary Israel, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Nikie Popovich, of Popovich Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Emily Raona Nunez appeals the trial court’s nonfinal orders: 1) denying her motion to continue the hearing on former husband’s motions to temporarily modify the parties’ parenting plan; 2) granting former husband’s motions for temporary modification; and 3) awarding former husband his attorney’s fees. We treat Nunez’s appeal of the trial court’s nonfinal order denying her motion to continue as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny it. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c). We affirm the trial court’s order granting temporary modification without further comment. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). Finally, because the trial court’s order awarding former husband his attorney’s fees does not quantify that award, we are without jurisdiction to review that aspect of the order. See, e.g., Burns v. Houk, 300 So. 3d 781, 782 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). We therefore dismiss this portion of Nunez’s appeal. AFFIRMED, in part; DENIED, in part; and DISMISSED, in part. COHEN, TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
