WILLIAM SPAUDE vs COMMISSION ON ETHICS

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED WILLIAM SPAUDE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-322 LT Case Nos. 19-174 21-2145EC 22-001 COMMISSION ON ETHICS, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 30, 2022 Administrative Appeal Commission on Ethics. from the E. Dylan Rivers, and Kevin A. Forsthoefel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Melody A. Hadley, Advocate for the Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee, and Steven J. Zuilkowski, and Grayden P. Schafer, and Suhail Chhabra, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. William Spaude, Mayor of the City of Bushnell, appeals the Final Order of the Florida Commission on Ethics which determined that he violated section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes (2022). Spaude argues that the Commission failed to establish by clear and convincing proof that he acted corruptly as defined by sections 112.313 and 112.312(9). We agree that neither the facts nor the law support a finding that Spaude acted corruptly as that term is defined. Accordingly, we reverse and quash the Commission’s final order. Based on this ruling, we do not reach Spaude’s remaining argument regarding the lack of proportionality of the penalty imposed to the violations found. REVERSED. ORDER QUASHED. EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur. EISNAUGLE, J., dissents, with opinion. 2 Case No. 5D22-322 LT Case Nos. 19-174 21-2145EC 22-001 EISNAUGLE, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent because I conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that Mayor Spaude acted “corruptly.” Here, while the benefit obtained was arguably small, a reasonable finder of fact could conclude that Spaude acted “with a wrongful intent and for the purpose of obtaining . . . a[] benefit resulting from [the] act . . . which is inconsistent with the proper performance of [Spaude’s] public duties.” § 112.312(9), Fla. Stat. (2022). 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.