PATRICIA K. STONE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PATRICIA K. STONE REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JANUARY, 25 2017. vs JASON KUBASKY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED PATRICIA K. STONE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PATRICIA K. STONE REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JANUARY 25, 2017, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D20-1989 LT Case No. 2018-CA-24972 JASON KUBASKY, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 5, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, George Paulk, Judge. Allan P. Whitehead and Erika McBryde, of Frese, Whitehead, & Anderson, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant. David J. Volk and Michael S. Dujovne, of Volk Law Offices, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. In this second appeal involving the same parties and the same case, the appellant, Patricia K. Stone, as Trustee of the Patricia K. Stone Revocable Trust Dated January 25, 2017 (“Stone”), challenges the trial court’s post-final judgment order denying her motion for attorney’s fees. Subsequently to this order, Stone prevailed in the first appeal when we affirmed, without opinion, the final judgment entered in her favor against the appellee, Jason Kubasky, after trial. Kubasky v. Stone, as Tr. of the Patricia K. Stone Revocable Tr. Dated Jan. 25, 2017, 315 So. 3d 669 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). In the first appeal, we also granted Stone’s motion for an award of appellate attorney’s fees; and we remanded the case back to the trial court for the sole purpose of determining the amount of these fees. Stone’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees filed in the first appeal raised the same grounds for entitlement to attorney’s fees as did her motion for an award of attorney’s fees in the trial court. That motion was denied by the lower court and is now before us in this instant appeal. Having determined in the first appeal that Stone is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees in this litigation, we reverse, under the law of the case doctrine, 1 the present denial order and remand with directions for the trial See Specialty Rests. Corp. v. Elliott, 924 So. 2d 834, 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“When successive appeals are taken in the same case, the law of the case doctrine applies. Under [this] doctrine, questions of law that have 1 2 court to award to Stone attorney’s fees for the services rendered by her counsel in the trial court proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions. LAMBERT, C.J., EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur. actually been decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and in the trial court through all subsequent stages of the proceedings.”). 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
