DAVID P. HENRY vs STATE OF FLORIDA
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID P. HENRY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-3325 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 13, 2019 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Morgan Laur Reinman, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Danielle R. Rufai, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. David Henry appeals the entry of an order finding him in violation of his probation. We conclude that there was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination that Henry violated Special Condition C, by having indirect contact with H.H. on February 14, February 24, April 2, April 13, and May 24, 2018. However, because the evidence was insufficient to support the other violations found by the trial court, we reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider the sentence imposed and for correction of the violation of probation order. See, e.g., Whitehead v. State, 22 So. 3d 846, 849 (Fla. 2009) (holding that where three of nine findings of probation violations were not supported by evidence, appellate court would remand to allow trial court to consider sentence imposed based upon six supported violations; further ordering trial court to correct order revoking probation). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
