R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY vs MARGARET BROWN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR BROWN
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Case No. 5D18-1630 MARGARET BROWN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR BROWN, Appellee/Cross Appellant. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 6, 2019 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, J. David Walsh, Judge. Troy A. Fuhrman and Marie Attaway Borland, of Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, Charles R. A. Morse, of Jones Day, New York, N.Y., and Jason T. Burnette, of Jones Day, Atlanta, GA, for Appellant/Cross Appellee. Gregory D. Prysock, Katy M. Massa and Antonio Luciano, of Morgan and Morgan, Jacksonville; Kathryn Barnett and Jason Gichner, of Morgan & Morgan, Nashville, TN; Keith R. Mitnik, of Morgan & Morgan, Orlando; Celene H. Humphries, Shea T. Moxon, Maegen Peek Luka and Thomas J. Seider, of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, for Appellee/Cross Appellant. JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge. We affirm the final judgment without discussion. As a result, we dismiss Margaret Brown's conditional cross-appeal as moot. AFFIRMED; CROSS-APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT. EVANDER, C.J., and SASSO, J., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
