Advanced Eyecare v. Reemployment

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ADVANCED EYECARE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-2295 REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed February 10, 2017 Administrative Appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission. Jason H. Clark, West Palm Beach, for Appellant. Katie E. Sabo, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida (“Employer”) appeals from a final order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, which affirmed a referee’s decision allowing a terminated employee to receive unemployment benefits. Having carefully considered Employer’s arguments on appeal and the record before us, we affirm. See, e.g., Parker v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 41 So. 3d 1090, 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“An appeal referee’s factual determinations are ordinarily presumed to be correct. Thus, if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the appeal referee’s findings, . . . this court must affirm.” (citation omitted)). AFFIRMED. COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.