Robert C. Clark v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ROBERT CHRISTOPHER CLARK, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-561 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed July 29, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, J. Michael Traynor, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Jeri M. Delgado, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PALMER, J. In this Anders1 appeal, Robert Christopher Clark (the defendant), challenges his judgment and sentence. Our review of the record revealed no reversible error apparent on its face. See State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987). However, we discovered 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). a scrivener's error in the sentencing document. Specifically, the heading of the sentencing document reads sentences as to "Count I, III, & III" when it should read "Counts I, II, & III". Accordingly, we remand for correction of the scrivener's error. See Taylor v. State, 120 So. 3d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (explaining that scrivener's errors in sentencing documents may be corrected by an Anders appeal). AFFIRMED; REMANDED. ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
