Geico v. Feller

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D15-505 LORI FELLER, ETC., ET AL., Respondents. ___________________________________/ Opinion filed September 4, 2015 Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, John M. Harris, Judge. B. Richard Young, Megan M. Hall, and Courtney F. Smith, of Young, Bill, Roumbos & Boles, P.A., Pensacola, for Petitioner. Andrew Pickett, of Alpizar Law, LLC, Palm Bay, for Respondents. PER CURIAM. Petitioner, GEICO General Insurance Company ("GEICO"), seeks certiorari review of an order compelling production of its claim files. We grant certiorari and quash the trial court's order overruling GEICO's objections, which were based upon claims of workproduct and attorney-client privilege. As the facts and issues are the same in this case as in Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., v. Feller, 163 So. 3d 1252 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), we adopt the discussion and analysis set forth in Sedgwick. Accordingly, we grant certiorari, quash the order on review, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. PETITION GRANTED. BERGER, WALLIS, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.