C.S.C-D. v. DCF

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED C.S.C-D., MOTHER AND M.C., FATHER, ETC., Appellants, v. Case No. 5D14-1985,5D14-2402 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed October 20, 2014 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, Clyde E. Wolfe, Judge. Philip A. Haas, of Haas Law, P.S., Seattle and Lori D. Loftis and Jeffrey D. Deen, of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, for Appellant. Ward L. Metzger, of Children's Legal Services, Jacksonville and Wendie M. Cooper, of Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See A.M. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 118 So. 3d 998, 999 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ("[I]f statutory deficiencies existed in the trial court's order, Appellant needed to preserve these issues 'by a motion for rehearing or ¦ [by otherwise bringing] the claimed deficiency to the attention of the trial court at a point when it could have been corrected.'" (quoting D.T. v. Fla. Dep't of Children & Families, 54 So. 3d 632, 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011))); R.B. v. Dep't Children & Families, 997 So. 2d 1216, 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (citing Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)). PALMER, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.