Andrews v. Aurelio et al

Filing 46

ORDER TO REISSUE SERVICE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/22/12. (Attachments: # 1 cert of service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2012: # 2 correct certificate of service) (mpb, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 J. AURELIO, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 11-2526 LHK (PR) ORDER TO REISSUE SERVICE 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a second amended civil rights 16 complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 27, 2012, the Court advised Plaintiff that it 17 was his responsibility to provide the information necessary to locate Defendants J. Aurelio, R. 18 Carriedo, and H. Ortiz. The Court also requested that the Litigation Coordinator at Pelican Bay 19 State Prison provide more information about the employment status of Defendants J. Aurelio, R. 20 Carriedo, and H. Ortiz. On July 18, 2012, counsel for Defendants contacted the Litigation 21 Coordinator to obtain this additional information. (Docket No. 43.) Counsel was provided with 22 the following: 23 1. Defendants J. Aurelio and H. Ortiz are Correctional Counselor I’s at California 24 Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility located at 900 Quebac Avenue, 25 Corcoran, California 93212; and 26 2. Defendant R. Carriedo is a Classification Staff Representative in the 27 Classification Services Unit. The headquarters for the Classification Services 28 Unit is located at 155 S. Street, Room 300 N, Sacramento, CA 95811 Order to Re-Issue Service G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Andrews526reissueUnservDs.wpd 1 2 3 Given the additional information provided for the unserved Defendants, the Court orders the following: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for 4 Waiver of Service of Summons, two copies of the Wavier of Service of Summons, a copy of the 5 second amended complaint and all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order to Defendant J. 6 Aurelio, Correctional Counselor I and Defendant H. Ortiz, Correctional Counselor I at 7 California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility located at 900 Quebac Avenue, 8 Corcoran, California 93212 and Defendant R. Carriedo, Classification Staff Representative 9 at Classification Services Unit, CDCR, 155 S. Street, Room 300 N, Sacramento, CA 95811. 10 2. The Clerk of the Court shall also mail a courtesy copy of the second amended 11 complaint and a copy of this Order to Donn Robert Duncan, II, 455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 12 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102 13 3. Additionally, the Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff. 14 4. Defendants are cautioned that Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15 requires them to cooperate in saving unnecessary costs of service of the summons and complaint. 16 Pursuant to Rule 4, if Defendants, after being notified of this action and asked by the Court, on 17 behalf of Plaintiff, to waive service of the summons, fail to do so, they will be required to bear 18 the cost of such service unless good cause be shown for their failure to sign and return the waiver 19 form. If service is waived, this action will proceed as if Defendants had been served on the date 20 that the waiver is filed, except that pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(B), Defendants will not be required 21 to serve and file an answer before sixty (60) days from the date on which the request for waiver 22 was sent. (This allows a longer time to respond than would be required if formal service of 23 summons is necessary.) Defendants are asked to read the statement set forth at the foot of the 24 waiver form that more completely describes the duties of the parties with regard to waiver of 25 service of the summons. If service is waived after the date provided in the Notice but before 26 Defendants have been personally served, the Answer shall be due sixty (60) days from the date 27 on which the request for waiver was sent or twenty (20) days from the date the waiver form is 28 filed, whichever is later. Order to Re-Issue Service 2 G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Andrews526reissueUnservDs.wpd 1 5. No later than ninety (90) days from the date of this order, Defendants shall file a 2 motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with respect to the cognizable claims 3 in the second amended complaint. 4 a. If Defendants elect to file a motion to dismiss on the grounds that Plaintiff 5 failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), 6 Defendant shall do so in an unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 7 F.3d 1108, 1119-20 (9th Cir. 2003). 8 b. Any motion for summary judgment shall be supported by adequate factual 9 documentation and shall conform in all respects to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil 10 Procedure. Defendants are advised that summary judgment cannot be granted, nor 11 qualified immunity found, if material facts are in dispute. If Defendants are of the opinion 12 that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, they shall so inform the Court 13 prior to the date the summary judgment motion is due. 14 6. Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and 15 served on Defendants no later than thirty (30) days from the date Defendants’ motion is filed. 16 Plaintiff is advised to read Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Celotex Corp. v. 17 Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (holding party opposing summary judgment must come forward 18 with evidence showing triable issues of material fact on every essential element of his claim). 19 Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary 20 judgment may be deemed to be a consent by Plaintiff to the granting of the motion, and granting 21 of judgment against Plaintiff without a trial. See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 22 1995) (per curiam); Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 653 (9th Cir. 1994). 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) days after Plaintiff’s opposition is filed. 8. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date. 9. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute his case. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the Court and all parties informed of any change of Order to Re-Issue Service 3 G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Andrews526reissueUnservDs.wpd 1 address and must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result 2 in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3 41(b). 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 8/22/12 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Directing Plaintiff to provide more info. 4 G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Andrews526reissueUnservDs.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?